In retrospect, this is not an interview, more a biography based on several long conversations:

Szilárd Szabad was born in a family of Hungarian, or to be more specific, Transylvanian, artisans. Both his father and grandfather were carpenters. The grandfather was a local tycoon who received all local commissions; the father was raised by a catholic priest as the first pupil in a Hungarian public school, he became an organist and studied to be a teacher. But his involvement in the young labor movement stopped his career, so he became a carpenter too. As an itinerant carpenter he could walk from village to village, perhaps primarily to have a chance to propagate his ideas.

Szilárd grew up in Nagybánya, then a small town, now a large Romanian mining town called Baia Mare. The times were difficult, with a World War ending with the peace treaty in Trianon, Versailles, in 1920 that transferred the Hungarian district Transylvania to Romania. Since the former Austria-Hungary had disintegrated, Hungary alone was divided and had over 70 percent of its area made into new states or handed over to neighbor nations.

But Transylvania had since long a dominant proportion of Romanian dwellers and the change of nationality did not mean an immediate disaster for the Hungarian population. [It would get worse. This is a complicated issue, and anyone wanting to learn more will find a wealth of documents at http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/rum.htm. Wikipedia has texts on the Trianon treaty and Transylvania.

– Romania needed the Hungarians, and especially the artisans, to rebuild the country. But I didn’t want to live under their rule. I did my military service, without learning Romanian, but I learned Esperanto. I left the country and in Belgium I met a Swede who spoke Esperanto and who told me about your Technical evening school.

Szilárd took a chance, went to Sweden, found a job at his friend’s carpenter’s workshop and was accepted at the Stockholm Technical Institute – in the aero-technical section. He had after all invented a helicopter back home – a construction that still rests among his papers, quite different from conventional conceptions. He studied between 1937 and 1941, but the World War made him lose his interest in aviation. He also realized that a foreigner had small chances finding a job in the war–dominated airplane industry.

He had daytime jobs during the four years in evening school, the second job as an assistant to a model builder. He remembers building a model of the old parliament’s interior.

A neighbour to the workshop was Sigurd Johansson, who made window displays and advertising for the Hasselblad chain of shops, the local Eastman Kodak. When Szilárd opened his own workshop to build foundry models, he soon had requests from Hasselblad. The war had stopped the import and now they needed someone who could repair cameras and cassettes. He soon got tired of fixing broken cassettes and build a series of 50 new ones. Hasselblad immediately ordered 500, and over the years the production would run into tens of thousands.

Build us a better camera!

The photographers from the nearby studio of Herman Bergne (Birger Eriksson, Ole Werner, Erik Lundquist and others) all worked with the Eastman studio camera, a solid construction I wood with a fixed front and a back with limited movements. Szilárd improved the Eastman construction with a swing and tilt back. He recently found his old designs, dated October 27, 1945. Soon a second prototype with an adjustable front was made and Hasselblad’s main office in Gothenburg ordered 10.The Stockholm branch wanted another 40. Most were made for 12 x 16,5 cm negatives, eventually also for 9 x 12 cm.

But he couldn’t put his name on them; they were to be named the Hasselblad Universal camera. What can a poor carpenter do? It still makes him bitter, having worked several years in anonymity. When he was asked, several years later, to produce a line of Hasselblad tripods, he answered:

– I have no Hasselblad tripods, only Szabad tripods.

The first cameras were built for the negative size 12 x 16 cm (slightly smaller than 5 x 7 inch). Later, smaller ones for 9 x 12 cm (4 x 5) were made. All built from Mahogany and in several batches with improvements added for each batch. Eventually the cameras were numbered (on the back of the base frame) but the system is still a bit unclear.

Bellows constituted a special problem. Wartime material was to stiff and thick; only years later would the quality improve. In anyone in the staff merits mention, it is Ingrid Isaksson who folded and glued all 1500 bellows with great skill, still finding time to help with other chores.

The black line

The red cameras had been improved, step-by-step. But in 1952, Szilárd was ready to manufacture a new construction, now in black wood and polished metal.  An important change was the small metal plate on the front proudly displaying the name Szabad - no more Hasselblad cameras!

The most important changes were the fixed base, that allowed a double extension, and the vertical supports made of metal.

The old model had metal supports screwed to a wooden base, and the back part of the base was a separate frame, that photographers frequently forgot on jobs. Now the camera back with the ground–glass could be turned, and both the front and the back were affixed to the bottom part. Both could be folded upwards when the camera was closed. The back part hooked on to the knob that secured the ground–glass and it took a little trick to get it unhooked – something young photograper Sten–Didrik Bellander didn’t know when he brought his new camera to a job and couldn’t open it in front of his customers!

The new cameras also featured a double rise on the front and a sliding tripod platform in order to get a good balance.

Of this series, about 50 were exported to the USA, most of them 8 x 10s. The American importer advertised them with the slogan Swedish quality and could have sold many more. But the small workshop in Stockholm, that moved away from the demolition of downtown Stockholm to Tavastgatan in the south side of the city, could only handle a limited production.

The last run was built in 1962. Szabad had then built about 1500 cameras.

In addition to that, he had manufactured a few special things, as 25 studio-cameras for Hasselblad, based on an old construction. The last job was two repro-cameras for the City Museum and the newspaper Svenska Dagbladet. Two more for SAAB and an enlarger for the army council, all for the format 24 x 30 cm. Finally he built the whole studio for the National Museum of Arts, including another repro-camera for 30 x 40 cm.

Szilárd closed his workshop, moved around to some smaller cities as Trosa, where the very last camera (18 x 24) was assembled in his kitchen from the remaining parts.

When I met him, he lived in a small house in the village of Vansbro, some 300 kilometers northwest from Stockholm. He was now and then visited by younger photographers who had acquired a camera in need of care. And care did they get, as prodigal children finally at home.

One morning, Szilárd came to see me with one of his cassettes in his hand.

– I did not build all of them myself, but I have at least held each and every one of them in my hands.

The carpenter’s hands still remembered.

--------

This piece was written in the autumn of 1979 at a time when Szilárd and I were already discussing if we could start a small workshop to build new cameras. But Szilárd opposed my proposals for modern tools and resented my friend Bobo Palm, who was willing to finance the operation. Szilárd closed the discussion in a letter, saying "I'd rather be your friend than getting swamped in a project that will make us enemies".